[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Nuclear Regulators: Attack Risk Low
On 16 Aug 2002 at 11:07, Ted Rockwell wrote:
> how can we assume anything else?
Hi Ted,
We each can assume many things, depending from which perspective we
come from :)
I do agree that those with appropriate knowledge, should speak out. I
don't think that this will happen, since this is akin to LNT. The
following comments are not directed at only the NRC, but, all govt.
agencies with specific accountabilities to protect the public. If
there is no problem, there is no need for regulations, resources or
attention. Without these, there is no continual flow of $$$ being
expended. This is a self-interest survivalism. Keep spouting fear and
there is continual job security.
-------------------------------------------------
Sandy Perle
Director, Technical
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service
ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100 Extension 2306
Fax:(714) 668-3149
E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/