Re: radiation exposue at st lucie

[Ted de Castro <tdc@XRAYTED.COM>]

For those that doubt what Jim M. and others have said many times over:

that the very fact that we investigate an occurrence is interpreted as

denying ANY claims that may be made as to its insignificant nature.



See what Norm wrote below.



While we are convinced that the more we investigate smaller and smaller

levels that we show our greater effort and greater safety - the antis

interpret this as further proof of how very very dangerous radiation

must be.  Stricter and stricter rules are not interpreted as greater

control and safety - but as merely confirmation of their paranoid

delusions.



Nothing I've seen yet confirms this better than Norm's own words below!



Norman Cohen wrote:

 

> My guess is that "Federal officials" would NOT be investigating if this were just

> a trivial dose exposure.

> 

> Norm

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/