Re: radiation exposue at st lucie

[Ted de Castro <tdc@XRAYTED.COM>]

Norman Cohen wrote:

> 

> Hi Ted,

> "Paranoid delusions" was a bit strongly worded, don't you think?



When the facts of radiation exposure results don't fit the hype - no -

its not too strong.  I'd say approximately correct.



> 

> I do understand the thrust of this discussion. Too little oversight and accidents

> happen. Too much oversight and, at least most

> of you feel, nit-picking results. Being the paranoid-delusional anti-nuker that you say

> I am, for now, I would still lean in the direction of nits being picked.



I don't mind the nit picking too much (sometimes) - it is just very

frustrating to do the best job you can - and then be damned for it!

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/