[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Time out

To: BERNARD L COHEN <blc+@PITT.EDU>, John Jacobus <crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM>
Subject: RE: Time out
From: John Jacobus <crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 12:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "Dukelow, James S Jr" <jim.dukelow@PNL.GOV>, radsafe <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0305151041150.5841-100000@unixs1.cis.pitt.edu>
Reply-To: John Jacobus <crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM>
Sender: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Dr. Cohen,

What was it?

BERNARD L COHEN <blc+@pitt.edu> wrote:

On Wed, 14 May 2003, John Jacobus wrote:
> The problem was with his posting a "finder's fee" and defense of his work.
Since he was also the judge of the evaluation, it appeared that no submission
would ever cast doubt on his work.

--In none of my reward offers was I the judge of the evaluation.
There was always a process specified for judging by others.

-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird@yahoo.com

Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Time out
  - From: BERNARD L COHEN <blc+@PITT.EDU>

References:
- RE: Time out
  - From: BERNARD L COHEN <blc+@PITT.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: respiratory tract dose - let's end the debate (simple as 1, 2, 3)
Next by Date: RE: NRC PROPOSES $6,000 FINE AGAINST ST. JOSEPH MERCY HOSPITAL IN
Prev by thread: RE: Time out
Next by thread: RE: Time out
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread