[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Indian Point portrayed as WMD
- To: E-mail <Radsafe>
- Subject: Indian Point portrayed as WMD
- From: Franta, Jaroslav
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:03:00 -0600
FYI.....
Jaro
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
NUCLEONICS WEEK JULY 3, 2003
Riverkeeper compares Indian Point
to WMDs as ad campaign hook
To gain public support for shutting down Indian Point,
the Garrison, N.Y.-based advocacy group Riverkeeper has
been running an aggressive advertising campaign this
month that likens the plant to a weapon of mass destruction (WMD).
The ads began appearing in national newspapers and on
radio and television in mid-June. The print ad carried the
message, "What Exactly Do Weapons of Mass Destruction
Look Like?" above a picture of the Indian Point station. The
accompanying text claimed there was "no evacuation plan"
for New York City residents who live "22 miles" away from
the plant, and that a "catastrophic release of radiation" from
the station would cause "a minimum of half a trillion dollars
in damages and tens of thousands of fatalities." Some
ads have shown up in bus shelters.
For the broadcast ads, the voice-overs were narrated by
Lorraine Bracco, an actress who plays a psychiatrist on the
popular HBO TV cable show, "The Sopranos."
Both types of ads play on fears of a terrorist attack,
asserting that Indian Point has been identified as an attractive
target and that a strike on the plant could turn it into a
WMD and "render all of the city uninhabitable."
Riverkeeper's latest advertising strategy, which the group
calls a part of its "public education campaign," was to
appeal to the business community. A June 30 ad in the Wall
Street Journal asks company leaders to "help us close the
plant and remove the threat by 1) Insisting on a no-fly zone
with air patrol. 2) Calling for federalization of security at the
plant. 3) Demanding that poorly protected and highly
radioactive spent fuel be transferred into Hardened On-Site
Storage. 4) Speaking up for the permanent closure of the plant."
All of the ads encourage citizens to contact New York
Gov. George Pataki (R) and make their voices heard.
Riverkeeper this week described the WMD ads as "attention-grabbing"
and successful and said it would follow up "with
provocative postcards addressed to various decision makers
from New Yorkers explaining their opposition to Indian
Point in a tongue-in-cheek way."
The group said it will have three versions of the post-cards,
which will be dropped off in bars and restaurants
throughout the city. The cards will be addressed to Entergy
CEO Wayne Leonard, whose company runs the plant, NRC
Chairman Nils Diaz, whom the group misidentified in a
June 30 press release as "Mrs. Niles Diaz," and Michael
Brown, under secretary for Emergency Preparedness &
Response in the Department of Homeland Security.
'Ridiculous'
"A nuclear power plant cannot explode like a weapon of
mass destruction," said NRC spokesman William Beecher.
"It's a ridiculous assertion."
Beecher criticized Riverkeeper for using NRC studies that
are more than 20 years old and were, even when they origi-nated,
not considered reflective of a real accident, he said.
Diaz' schedule, circulated at NRC, includes tentative
dates in September and October to participate with Sen.
Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) in town meetings in New
York on the topic of Indian Point.
Entergy spokesman Jim Steets said Riverkeeper's ads are
little more than scare-mongering. "They are not based on
fact," Steets said. "They want to give people the impression
that Indian Point is a nuclear bomb."
Steets said the ads use "misinformation" and "exaggeration"
for effect and that Riverkeeper has selectively pulled
information from various NRC and other governmental and
private-sector reports to make the ads appear fact-based.
Riverkeeper has on its Web site
(http://www.riverkeeper.org) a 13-page backgrounder that it
says provides the facts and references to support the state-ments
in its ad campaign. Steets said the TV ads "depict people
as melting into the streets of New York....Clearly their
intent is to scare people, but it's not resonating well.
Nobody endorses a scare tactic."-Jenny Weil, Washington
========================================