Re: Detailed evidence fails to support man-made climate change

[maury <maury@webtexas.com>]

Awww, that's OK, John, a bit of skepticism is understandable. But you

are yanking my chain pretty hard now. The good senator urges a lot more

research. Off hand, I can't recall anyone in the Congress that advocates

scraping all the (environmental) laws we now have in place; can you? I

don't think even us nasty libertarians have suggested that. I wish you'd

at least skim through his presentation; honest, it won't bite ....



I'm in the process of attempting to get his visuals that went with it

and will post links if I can get them.



Note to Bob Howd -- I'm working on it .... (g)

Cheers,

Maury

____________

All living things prefer life to non-life; however, since life is a

struggle against entropy, in the end, my money is on entropy.

========================



John Jacobus wrote:



> Sorry if I seem over reactive to this issue, but when

> you have a politician from a party affiliated with an

> administration that opposed environmental laws, that

> campaigned against those environmental laws already in

> place, I tend to think he might have an ulterior

> motive rather then the well-being of the country and

> its citizens.

>

> After all is the good senator saying that we need more

> good studies or that we should scrap all the laws we

> now have in place?

>

> --- maury <maury@webtexas.com> wrote:

> Nothing was mentioned about promoting a political

> agenda. Whether the agenda is pro or con nuclear, the  important

> information is the content, not the messenger.



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/