[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re: mercury
Hmmmmmmm,
This is from: jpreisig@aol.com .
Howdy radsafe people. Hope all is well in your vicinity.
The Spallation Neutron Source (Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA) is slated to
come online in 2006 or thereabouts, as a source of neutrons. It will work
by slamming one GeV protons into mercury, thereby producing spallation
products, and hopefully some neutrons. The reaction is discussed a bit
in the book by Patterson & Thomas (Accelerator Health Physics). I hope the
mercury will be contained in some sort of closed loop system. Anyone have
an inkling of the environmental effects of such a system??? I think I'd
rather
see a new reactor built at Oak Ridge. Oh well.
Dr. Ruth (Weiner) was lamenting the demise of the FFTF (Fast Fission
Test Facility?) and its impact on production of medical radionuclides. It
appears that the folks at Los Alamos (LANSCE, previously known as LAMPF)
are making medical radionuclides using proton irradiation, I guess. I read
about
this lately, but I don't recall where. BLIP at Brookhaven does similar
things.
Researchers at Brookhaven (see their web-site) are claiming to have
observed a fairly rare particle reaction: Kaon ---> Pion + neutrino
+ anti-neutrino . I don't give the particle charges here, but you can
read
about it on Brookhaven's web-site.
All this chatter from Niagara Falls reminds me of an old Three Stooges
comedy routine about Niagara Falls (Slowly I turn, inch by inch, step by
step,...., Niagara Falls...). I was just thinking about this, and sure
enough,
the comedy routine shows up on Television. Sorry to digress.
Not every radionuclide at Love Canal and elsewhere leaches out of
the
site at the velocity of groundwater. Waste form and packaging can
control
radionuclide transport rates. Also some radionuclides just stay where
they
are, without much movement at all. I won't suggest that bad waste
storage siting and design should occur at all.
RADSAFE is so excellent.....
Regards, Joseph R. Preisig, Ph.D.