[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Senate Eases Rules on Defense Nuke Cleanup
Senate Eases Rules on Defense Nuke Cleanup
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,121711,00.html
Thursday, June 03, 2004
WASHINGTON - The Senate on Thursday agreed to ease cleanup requirements
for tanks holding millions of gallons of highly radioactive waste from
Cold War-era bomb making.
Senate critics said the change would leave poisonous sludge in
underground tanks and risk contamination of groundwater.
An attempt to block the change failed by the narrowest of margins.
Senators voted 48-48 on an amendment offered by Sen. Maria Cantwell,
D-Wash., that would have stripped the provision from a defense
authorization bill.
The provision allows the Energy Department (search) to reclassify
radioactive sludge in 51 tanks at a South Carolina nuclear site so it
can be left in place and covered by concrete, instead of being entombed
in the Nevada desert.
While the plan has been approved by South Carolina officials, it brought
sharp criticism from officials in Washington and Idaho who feared the
change would put intense pressure on them to agree to a similar cleanup
plan at nuclear sites in their states.
The proposal also left South Carolina's two senators sharply divided.
Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., who had put the provision into the defense
bill, said it will quicken waste cleanup at the Savannah River nuclear
complex (search) near Aiken, S.C., by 23 years and save $16 billion. He
rejected claims the waste would harm the environment.
Sen. Fritz Hollings, D-S.C., said the sludge accounts for more than half
of the radioactivity in the tanks of liquid waste and endangers future
generations. It's "not harmless sludge we can pour sand over and cover
with concrete" as the Energy Department proposes, said Hollings.
The Savannah River tanks contain 34 million gallons of liquid waste.
Sludge accounts for about 1 percent of the waste volume.
While supporters of the measure insisted it would apply only to waste at
the Savannah River site, opponents said the change in nuclear waste
policy would create a "clear precedent" that could force other states --
mainly Washington and Idaho where there also are defense waste tanks --
to accept less safe cleanup plans.
Cantwell, who led the push to kill the measure, accused the
administration of trying to "sneak" the change in cleanup requirements
through Congress by tacking it onto a defense measure in closed-door
proceedings without hearings.
Graham's provision was put into the $447 billion defense bill during
consideration by the Armed Services Committee without hearings. The
House panel refused to include the changes in its version of the defense
bill and, instead, called on the National Academy of Sciences to examine
the Energy Department cleanup proposal.
The White House is trying "to blackmail my state to accept a lower
cleanup standard," declared Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash.
The tanks of nuclear waste are left over from decades of producing
plutonium and highly enriched uranium for nuclear weapons. A 1982 law
requires that all waste from such reprocessing must be buried at a
central repository planned for Nevada.
But the Energy Department argues that the residual sludge should be
considered low-level waste and should not have to be removed. Instead,
the department wants to cover the sludge with cement-like grout, saying
that would be protective for hundreds of years.
Last year a federal judge, acting on a lawsuit by environmentalists,
ruled that such an approach violates the 1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act
(search). To get around the ruling, the department wants to get the law
changed.
There are 177 tanks with 53 million gallons of waste at the Hanford
nuclear site near Richland, Wash., and 900,000 gallons in tanks at the
INEEL facility near Idaho Falls, Idaho.
Michael G. Stabin, PhD, CHP
Assistant Professor of Radiology and Radiological Sciences
Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences
Vanderbilt University
1161 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37232-2675
Phone (615) 343-0068
Fax (615) 322-3764
Pager (615) 835-5153
e-mail michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu
internet www.doseinfo-radar.com
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/