RadSafe Archive Mail Index June, 2004

• Thread Index
• [RadSafe Home]
• [RadSafe Archives Search & Browse]

Listing format is the following:

• Subject (# of follow-ups) From
  

• Draft ICRP recomendations (0) Fred Dawson
  
• RE: Detectors and humidity (1) John_Sukosky
  
• Re: Detectors, humidity, etc. (0) John_Sukosky
  
• Senior Health Physicist opening (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Gobal War (4) John_Sukosky
  
• Re: Detectors and humidity (0) Vincent King
  
• July 2004 Health Physics Journal TOC (0) BABusby
  
• Re: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Gobal War (1) maury
  
• Re: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Gobal War (0) garyi
  
• RE: Detectors and humidity (1) John_Sukosky
  
• Re: Nuclear Power, Trivializing Global W (2) Stewart Farber
  
• RE: Detectors and humidity (0) Parry, Don
  
• RE: Puzzler: How Does Humidity Affect C (0) John_Sukosky
  
• RE: Nuclear Power, Trivializing Global W (0) Robert Yoss
  
• Re: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Gobal War (1) garyi
  
• RE: Detectors and humidity (0) Cadanau, Rod
  
• RE: Nuclear Power, Trivializing Global W (0) Riely, Brian P.
  
• Re: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Gobal War (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Detectors and humidity (0) Vincent King
  
• Ba-133/I-131 calibration procedures (0) Samson, Daniel J
  
• Radiation Resistant Bacteria (1) james.g.barnes
  
• Re: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Gobal War (1) Raymond A Hoover
  
• Re: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Global Wa (1) Johansen, Kjell
  
• Re: Radiation Resistant Bacteria (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Gobal Warming Hoax! and CO2 a twist (1) daleboyce
  
• CO2 absorption reference (0) daleboyce
  
• RE: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Gobal War (2) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• US EPA docket OW-2003-0070 - Office of W (0) Donivan Porterfield
  
• Re: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Gobal War (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Lead case and bricks (1) Dr. Khalid Aleissa
  
• RE: NRC on Realism (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• I'm Convinced: Humid Air is Less Dense (0) John_Sukosky
  
• Lead case and bricks (1) Dr. Khalid Aleissa
  
• RE: Nuclear Power, Trivializing Global W (0) Rick Orthen
  
• " Canada lags behind U.S. in curbing tox (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Global Wa (1) Raymond A Hoover
  
• RE: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Gobal War (0) garyi
  
• Re: Lead case and bricks (0) garyi
  
• RE: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Gobal War (0) garyi
  
• Re: US EPA docket OW-2003-0070 - Office (1) Jim Hardeman
  
• Rutgers University Radiation Safety/Scie (0) eac8
  
• RE: US EPA docket OW-2003-0070 - Office (0) Scott, Arthur (MOL)
  
• General guidelines for the assessment of (0) Strom, Daniel J
  
• Re: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Global Wa (0) John Fleck
  
• RE: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Gobal War (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• density of humid air (0) JGinniver
  
• Re: Gobal Warming Hoax! and CO2 a twist (0) John Fleck
  
• Re: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Gobal War (1) Howard Long
  
• In-Flight Radiation No Big Worry for Pre (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Gobal War (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• CANCER INCIDENCE AND DEATH RATES ON THE (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Nuclear Power Des NOT Need Gobal War (0) John Fleck
  
• EPA Opportunity to Comment on EPA Risk A (0) james.g.barnes
  
• radiation safety contractor (1) Wes Van Pelt
  
• e-mail of Luke I. McCormick (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Radionuclides in "Green Sand"-Are there (4) Dale Dusenbury
  
• Re: Radionuclides in "Green Sand"-Are th (0) JGinniver
  
• nukes in Poland ? (0) Jaro
  
• Re: Radionuclides in "Green Sand"-Are th (0) daleboyce
  
• Re: Radionuclides in "Green Sand"-Are th (0) daleboyce
  
• Re: US EPA docket OW-2003-0070 - Office (0) Rick Dickinson
  
• Senate Eases Rules on Defense Nuke Clean (1) Stabin, Michael
  
• "Just a couple of mm of lead" (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: Radiation Resistant Bacteria (1) andre geerdink
  
• "The Radioactive Boy Scout" (0) Minnema, Douglas
  
• RE: Lead case and bricks (0) John Kuperus
  
• RE: Radionuclides in "Green Sand"-Are th (0) Jim Otton
  
• Re: Radiation Resistant Bacteria (0) daleboyce
  
• Re: Senate Eases Rules on Defense Nuke C (0) Howard Long
  
• radiation safety contractor (0) Nielsen, Erik
  
• alarming detectors for first responders (0) Harry Small
  
• Gorbachev in Barcelona (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Job Opportunity at GE Nuclear (0) Careway, Harold A. (GE Energy)
  
• AW: Gorbachev in Barcelona (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Preview experience (0) maury
  
• Immediate job opportunityHP/Rad Eng-TN (0) Debby Shonka
  
• Pulsed X-ray Field Measurement (0) Mercado, Don
  
• Franz S. (0) Mccormick, Luke I
  
• Portable x-ray units in NY (2) Tony Hedges
  
• THE COMING ENERGY CRUNCH (long) (0) Susan Gawarecki
  
• AW: Gorbachev in Barcelona (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: THE COMING ENERGY CRUNCH (long) (1) Nardi, A. Joseph
  
• Norelco MG300 (1) Borisky, Michael (Civ, ARL/CoS)
  
• AW: RE : alarming detectors for first re (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: THE COMING ENERGY CRUNCH (long) (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Portable x-ray units in NY (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Radionuclides in "Green Sand"-Are th (2) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Portable x-ray units in NY (0) garyi
  
• Tutorial: Radiation Shielding in Diagnos (0) Nisy Ipe
  
• Re: Norelco MG300 (0) Bob Westerdale
  
• AW: Radionuclides in "Green Sand"-Are th (0) rurban
  
• Re: Norelco MG300 (0) John Jacobus
  
• Why are "professionals" on this list so (0) celia rajkovich
  
• RE: Why are "professionals" on this list (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: AW: Radionuclides in "Green Sand"-Cl (3) Dale Dusenbury
  
• RE: Why are "professionals" on this list (0) Neil, David M
  
• Study: Illnesses Linked to Power Plants (0) LancerGT
  
• Re: AW: Radionuclides in "Green Sand"-Cl (0) Russ Johnson
  
• AW: AW: Radionuclides in "Green Sand"-Cl (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AN ICY RIDDLE AS BIG AS GREENLAND (0) Susan Gawarecki
  
• " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be a D (1) Jaro
  
• Potential Nuclear Engineer Position (0) Ledbetter, Cynthia M.
  
• "There are studies (of childhood cancer) (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (1) Raymond A Hoover
  
• RE: Position Available #EH/017033/WRADSA (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (0) KSmith
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (0) Ian Adam
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (3) LNMolino
  
• Re: Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Woul (0) bobcherry
  
• Much less to Padilla `dirty bomb' than m (0) Susan Gawarecki
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (0) Susan Gawarecki
  
• RE: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (1) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• Re: "There are studies (of childhood can (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (0) Gerald Nicholls
  
• RE: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (0) William Ulicny
  
• historical poster (0) Ansari, Armin
  
• Re: historical poster (0) bobcherry
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (2) John Jacobus
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Don`t worry, be happy! (0) Ing. Maher
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (2) John Jacobus
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (0) BLHamrick
  
• Global Warming, Earth Orientation... (0) JPreisig
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• RE: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (2) Jaro
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Cannot have it both ways (1) jjcohen
  
• RE: Cannot have it both ways (1) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• RE: Cannot have it both ways (0) John Jacobus
  
• MEDHP-SEC: Health Physicist Position at (0) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• RE: IP Takeover? (0) Charles Migliore
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Smarter technology for port defense (0) Susan Gawarecki
  
• Position Opening (0) SAHCI
  
• RE: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (1) Lars Persson
  
• Pravda article on Hormesis (0) Wes Van Pelt
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: " Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be (0) John Jacobus
  
• PCM-2 turning off detectors by itself ye (2) Pmink
  
• AW: PCM-2 turning off detectors by itsel (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Green Sand, 1) clarification, 2) possibl (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: AW: PCM-2 turning off detectors by i (0) Pmink
  
• Rates for x-ray quality control evaluati (0) Steve Meiners
  
• UNH Announces System to Track Radioactiv (1) David Gillum
  
• Database of radiation therapy products (0) Kraus, George W.
  
• Re: UNH Announces System to Track Radioa (0) Russ Johnson
  
• RE: UNH Announces System to Track Radioa (3) David Gillum
  
• RE: UNH Announces System to Track Radioa (0) alstonchris
  
• Re: UNH Announces System to Track Radioa (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• question on 1969 Rocky Flats fire (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• UPS (2) Russ Rogers
  
• Re: UPS (0) Brian Rees
  
• RE: UPS (0) Neil, David M
  
• Re: UNH Announces System to Track Radioa (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• re: question on 1969 Rocky Flats fire (0) rurban
  
• re: question on 1969 Rocky Flats fire (0) rurban
  
• RE: UPS Uniforms -- FALSE RUMOR!!! (0) George J. Vargo
  
• UPS UNIFORMS (0) Mark McCracken
  
• re: question on 1969 Rocky Flats fire (0) rurban
  
• Enriched In-113 (0) Poston, Jay (John) (PEA)
  
• Book Review Requested (4) Jenkins, Ken A.
  
• LSC (Delay before burst) (0) Arvic Harms
  
• Re: Book Review Requested (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Book Review Requested (0) Keith Earnshaw
  
• Re: Book Review Requested (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Prices of Gallon (2) john grant
  
• Acticle: Lung cancer screening raises lu (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Prices of Gallon (0) Cindy Bloom and Steve LaMonica
  
• Any thoughts on the repair of light sens (0) JGinniver
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (2) Keith Welch
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (2) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Acticle: Lung cancer screening raise (0) Susan Gawarecki
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (2) Otto G. Raabe
  
• [Fwd: Be wary. the PP lurks....] (0) maury
  
• Does CT lung cancer screening LOWER lung (2) Howard Long
  
• Re: Does CT lung cancer screening LOWER (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Medical Equipment - DAC 3000 Hypodermic (0) BTE ELECTRONICS S.A.
  
• Tissue ionization by UV (1) daleboyce
  
• VB: SUSPECT: FW: Green Sand, 1) clarific (0) "�kerblom, Gustav"
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Does CT lung cancer screening LOWER (1) John Jacobus
  
• The Realism Project (1) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: UNH Announces System to Track Radioa (0) Roberta Clarke
  
• Re: Tissue ionization by UV (2) Michael McNaughton
  
• Re: Book Review Requested (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Tissue ionization by UV (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Tissue ionization by UV (0) daleboyce
  
• Re: Prices of Gallon (0) Bernard Cohen
  
• Re: Does CT lung cancer screening LOWER (1) Howard Long
  
• Re: Does CT lung cancer screening LOWER (0) John Jacobus
  
• Vacancy Announcement (0) Ray Johnson CHP PE RSO
  
• List SPAM (0) Hobie Shackford
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) TConley
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (2) John Jacobus
  
• Certified Medical Dosimetrist (0) Steve Meiners
  
• Workers Exposed to Radiation at Nev. Bas (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: The Realism Project (1) Charles Pennington
  
• smoke detector letter (0) Aggie_Barlow
  
• Re: smoke detector letter (1) Venkata Lanka
  
• Looking for 83-EHD-87 (0) Sewell, Linda
  
• Re: smoke detector letter (0) James Dwyer
  
• RE: The Realism Project (1) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: Looking for 83-EHD-87 (0) Sewell, Linda
  
• U decay calculator ? (1) Jay Beckel
  
• Re: smoke detector letter (0) Aggie_Barlow
  
• AW: U decay calculator ? (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: The Realism Project (0) Al Tschaeche
  
• RE: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) Peter Thomas
  
• RE: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• leakage from sealed tritium: how much? (0) Mauro Campoleoni
  
• Re: smoke detector letter (0) Russ Johnson
  
• State Officials Offer Travel Tips for Nu (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) Howard Long
  
• RE: Decision on nuclear fusion reactor s (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• sulfur analyzer (0) EMCTGA
  
• RE: Decision on nuclear fusion reactor s (1) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Decision on nuclear fusion reactor s (0) Jaro
  
• FW: The Realism Project (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Job Posting (0) Williams, James
  
• Eu-152/Eu-154 Suppliers? (0) Burress, Paul
  
• Tax for nuclear dump draws industry ire (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Op-ed piece: "Nuclear Accidents: Fact an (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• ICRP now presents a draft text of the 20 (0) Fred Dawson
  
• Provision of Health Physics Monitoring r (0) JGinniver
  
• ICRP now presents a draft text of the 20 (0) Fred Dawson
  
• Numerous Transuranics found at Niagara - (2) NiagaraNet
  
• RE: Numerous Transuranics found at Niaga (0) Wright, Will (DHS-PSB)
  
• Hello Franz (1) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Numerous Transuranics found at Niaga (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• FDA PHS Radioactive Material Reference M (0) Urciuolo, Louis
  
• RE: Numerous Transuranics found at Niaga (0) Wright, Will \(DHS-PSB\)
  
• Boeing is frying them..instead of flying (0) WBrunkowConsult
  
• RE: Numerous Transuranics found at Niaga (0) Mercado, Don
  
• Re: Numerous Transuranics found at Niaga (0) Charly Frey
  
• Re: Numerous Transuranics found at Niag (2) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Numerous Transuranics found at Niaga (2) Charly Frey
  
• Re: Numerous Transuranics found at Niag (0) Steven Dapra
  
• DOE Laboratory Technicians Needed (0) ERGKBAKER
  
• AW: Numerous Transuranics found at Niaga (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Hello Franz (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Numerous Transuranics found at Niag (0) Raymond A Hoover
  
• Looking For a Calibration Facility (1) McDonald, Michael
  
• Re: Numerous Transuranics found at Niaga (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: Niagara Falls Fission Products... (0) JPreisig
  
• Re: Looking For a Calibration Facility (0) JSBland
  
• Re: Looking For a Calibration Facility (0) J. Marshall Reber
  
• FS: Pb Shield , Make Offer (0) Pete_Bailey
  
• Re:Numerous Transuranics found at Niagar (2) Mccormick, Luke I
  
• Openings for Health Physicists (0) Flowerday, Scott
  
• AW: Numerous Transuranics found at Niaga (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Numerous Transuranics found at Niag (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Numerous Transuranics found at Niag (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re:Numerous Transuranics found at Niagar (0) Raymond A Hoover
  
• Mortality of employees of the United Kin (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) Howard Long
  
• CT, radiation, and risk: two views (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (2) John Jacobus
  
• Re:Numerous Transuranics found at Niagar (0) Mccormick, Luke I
  
• Re: Numerous Transuranics found at Niaga (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: Numerous Transuranics found at Niag (0) Raymond A Hoover
  
• August 2004 Health Physics Journal (0) BABusby
  
• RE: Niagara Falls Fission Products... (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• RE: Numerous Transuranics found at Niaga (0) Mercado, Don
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) Howard Long
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) John Jacobus
  
• Job Posting - CancerCare Manitoba, Canad (0) Eric Cowdrey
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• query (3) Bernard Cohen
  
• Looking for Small Re-usable Type A Conta (0) Jim Blute
  
• Re: query (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: query (0) daleboyce
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (3) Susan Gawarecki
  
• Re: query (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Looking for Small Re-usable Type A Conta (0) Roy A. Parker
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (0) Russ Johnson
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) Howard Long
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) jjcohen
  
• Looking for MCA well counter systems (0) Mccormick, Luke I
  
• RE: Looking for Small Re-usable Type A C (0) alstonchris
  
• AW: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Numerous Transuranics found at Niaga (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: AW: Article: Lung cancer screening r (2) Otto G. Raabe
  
• RE: query (0) John R Johnson
  
• Re: AW: Article: Lung cancer screening r (0) Mark Sonter
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (2) John Jacobus
  
• Re: AW: Article: Lung cancer screening r (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: AW: Numerous Transuranics found at N (0) denison8
  
• RE: Looking for MCA well counter systems (0) Morten Sickel
  
• RE: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (0) Falo, Gerald A Dr HMJF
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (0) John Jacobus
  
• Book - 100 Most Dangerous Things (0) Tom Mohaupt
  
• RE: Looking for MCA well counter systems (1) Toro Laszlo
  
• Re: Looking for MCA well counter systems (0) Tom Hazlett
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) Howard Long
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (1) Howard Long
  
• Re: Article: Lung cancer screening raise (0) John Jacobus
  
• Wound dosimetry question (1) Kari_Toews
  
• Job posting (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Ag-110m Suppliers (0) Lorna Hubble
  
• Looking for contacts who might sell Pana (0) Icenogle, Bill
  
• Re: Wound dosimetry question (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Wound dosimetry question (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Fire Response, Govt Reduction, Radiation (0) Howard Long
  
• Homeland Secruity S&T Budget -- focus on (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Wound dosimetry question (0) JSBland
  
• World's Oldest Nuclear Power Plant Close (0) Sandy Perle