Re: US EPA docket OW-2003-0070 - Office of Water radiochemical methodsproposednotice - June 7 deadline

[Rick Dickinson <rtd@notesguy.com>]

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 10:16:38 -0400, "Jim Hardeman"

<Jim_Hardeman@dnr.state.ga.us> wrote:



>Donivan ¯

>

>As I recall, the EPA regulations for drinking water specify Ra-226 and Ra-228 concentrations in units of pCi/l, so in my humble opinion, it's appropriate for the procedure to stipulate that results be reported in those units. My experience with this procedure (and this laboratory) gives me confidence that they're capable of reporting in whatever units are required. If I wanted them to report distances in kilo-furlongs per micro-fortnight, it wouldn't be a problem <grin>

>

>Jim Hardeman

>Jim_Hardeman@dnr.state.ga.us 



Jim,



If I was dealing with a laboratory that reported distances in velocity

units, I *would* have a problem with it. <bigger grin>



 - Rick Dickinson



-- 

Murphy's Law of Engineering:

Dimensions will always be given in the least usable form.  Velocity, for

example, will be expressed in furlongs per fortnight.

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/