[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nuclear Waste,Science, & Politics: Regaining Virginity?
I refer only to LLW --There are many documents published by IAEA
considering all possible aspects in the management of these category of
radwaste. I'll exclude the references on geological sites, however I can
affirm also that are many on this topic.
Follows a list from 2000 to 2004 of references, to those interested, is
possible to download. There are equal size from 1995 to 1999, also with the
possibility of download.
The main problem on Radwaste: Communication
a) Public is not well informed about radioactive waste
b) Public is very poorly informed about radioactive waste
Jose Julio Rozental
joseroze@netvision.net.il
Israel
Developing Multinational Radioactive Waste Repositories: Infrastructural
Framework and Scenarios of Co-operation
IAEA TECDOC Series No. 1413, 2004
Predisposal Management of Organic Radioactive Waste
Technical Reports Series No. 427, 2004
An International Peer Review of the License Application for the Australian
Near Surface Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility, 2004
Surveillance and Monitoring of Near Surface Disposal Facilities for
Radioactive
Safety Reports Series No. 35, 2004
Radiation Protection and the Management of Radioactive Waste in the Oil and
Gas Industry
Safety Reports Series No. 34, 2003
Safety Indicators for the Safety Assessment of Radioactive Waste
IAEA TECDOC Series No. 1372, 2003
Selection of Efficient Options for Processing and Storage of Radioactive
Waste in Countries with Small Amounts of Waste Generation
IAEA TECDOC Series No. 1371, 2003
Radioactive Waste Management Status and Trends Number 3, 2003
Considerations in the Development of Near Surface Repositories for
Radioactive Waste
Technical Reports Series No. 417, 2003
Radioactive Waste Management Glossary 2003 Edition, 2003
The Long Term Storage of Radioactive Waste: Safety and Sustainability A
Position Paper of International Experts, 2003
Predisposal Management of Low and Intermediate Level Radioactive Waste Safet
y Guide
Safety Standards Series No. WS-G-2., 2003
Combined Methods for Liquid Radioactive Waste Treatment
IAEA TECDOC Series No. 1336, 2003
Management of Low and Intermediate Level Radioactive Wastes with Regard to
their Chemical Toxicity
IAEA TECDOC Series No. 1325, 2003
Radiation Protection and Radioactive Waste Management in the Operation of
Nuclear Power Plants Safety Guide
Safety Standards Series No. NS-G-2.7, 2002
Management of Radioactive Waste from the Mining and Milling of Ores Safety
Guide
Safety Standards Series No. WS-G-1.2, 2002
Radioactive Waste Management - Status and Trends - Number 2, 2002
Socio-Economic and Other Non-Radiological Impacts of the Near Surface
Disposal of Radioactive Waste
IAEA TECDOC Series No. 1308, 2002
Technical Considerations in the Design of Near Surface Disposal Facilities
for Radioactive Waste
IAEA TECDOC Series No. 1256, 2001
Radioactive Waste Management - Status and Trends - Number 1, 2001
Handling and Processing of Radioactive Waste from Nuclear Applications
Technical Reports Series No. 402, 2001
Waste Inventory Record Keeping Systems (WIRKS) for the Management and
Disposal of Radioactive Waste
IAEA TECDOC Series No. 1222, 2001
Management of Radioactive Waste from the Use of Radionuclides in Medicine
IAEA TECDOC Series No. 1183, 2000
Legal and Governmental Infrastructure for Nuclear, Radiation, Radioactive
Waste and Transport Safety Requirements
Safety Standards Series No. GS-R-1, 2000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stabin, Michael" <michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu>
To: "jjcohen" <jjcohen@PRODIGY.NET>; <vargo@physicist.net>; "John Jacobus"
<crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM>; <franz.schoenhofer@CHELLO.AT>;
<radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 4:42 PM
Subject: RE: Nuclear Waste,Science, & Politics: Regaining Virginity?
>
> >The "scientific" approach that has been applied over the past 50 years,
> at a cost of billions of dollars has failed to find an acceptable
> solution
>
> I could not disagree more. The scientific and engineering solutions that
> I have seen, for both high and low level waste are, to me, acceptable.
> And I mean that including if I and my family lived near such facilities.
> That is not to say there are not concerns that we can discuss and work
> towards even better solutions. What is not acceptable to me are when
> honest, skilled professionals spend thousands of hours and come up with
> a reasonable and acceptable solution, and it is challenged with
> nonsensical objections by someone whose main credentials are that they
> starred in a movie about a nuclear power plant, and that challenge is
> accepted by Congress and society.
>
> Mike
>
> Michael G. Stabin, PhD, CHP
> Assistant Professor of Radiology and Radiological Sciences
> Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences
> Vanderbilt University
> 1161 21st Avenue South
> Nashville, TN 37232-2675
> Phone (615) 343-0068
> Fax (615) 322-3764
> Pager (615) 835-5153
> e-mail michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu
> internet www.doseinfo-radar.com
>
>
> ************************************************************************
> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
> unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
> text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
> with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
> http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
>
>