[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Repy to Capt.Plutonium re New RHH
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 95 11:14:59 -0600
> Reply-to: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
> From: BERNIE2421@delphi.com
> To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
> Subject: Repy to Capt.Plutonium re New RHH
> The error you noted has been corrected in the new printing of the "Radiologi
> ealth Handbook." The orginal one was noted in a letter to the HP Newsletter.
> Scinta, Inc.,
> nd its editors did not plan to engage in imaginative spelling.
> The mistake was do to the manufacturing process. We have an will continue
> to provide this addenda and correction sheets. We don't type so well via
> the electronic media either. Notice "do" and "an" ab ove. This letter does
> reflect the opinion of Scinta, and B.Shleien.
> There is a difference between literacy and printing books. Erre est humare.
quod erat demonstrandum
errare humanum est is how it's written in the back of my dictionary.
>Russ
cmeyer@brc1.tdh.texas.gov
(512)834-6688