[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thanks/Need RSO?
Annette,
I am sure your friend will findout from the NRC that the RSO is
needed in this case. I think your friend needs to bother the RSO. He/she
is responsible for the oversight of all surveys needed to close out the
facility. Reassignment to another location does not alleviate the RSO from
being responsible for the laboratory that is being closed down if it is
listed on the facility licencse.
JERRY THOMAS
At 08:39 10/4/95 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear Radsafers,
>
>Wow! I am so impressed and I can't thank you all enough for
>all the responses to my questions yesterday. My boss is
>also very impressed that I know the right people!
>
>I feel much more comfortable about my situation and think we/I
>will institute a minimal program. However, my colleague has alot
>more work ahead of her. Her lab in Massachusetts had a source removed
>several years ago, but their license still allowed them to use
>ECDs and chlorine 36 and krypton 85. The RSO has been
>reassigned to a nearby location, but we have been asked to not
>bother him unless necessary. I feel that as RSO his signature
>should be on the closure documents, but my friend will verify
>that when she calls the NRC for advice.
>
>Thanks again.
>Annette Kubinec
>
>
CAPT Jerry A. Thomas, MSC, USN
Chief Radiological Physics
Department of Radiology/Nuclear Medicine
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
4301 Jones Bridge Road
Bethesda, MD 20814-4799
E-mail: thomas@bob.usuf2.usuhs.mil
Phone: (301) 295-3246
Fax: (301) 295-3893