[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RESUSPENSION FACTORS
Reply to danny_l_rice@rl.gov:
The problem with resuspension of radioactive materials is that it can
vary tremendously, depending on conditions, primarily the physical
characteristics of the contamination. By resuspension, I mean the
mechanical process by which solid materials go airborne. That is,
solid materials and fine powders "evaporate" to some extent, by
molecular vibration, bombardment and entrainment in air. As you say,
if you look in the literature values from 1.0E-4 to 1.0E-8 and even
less are given.
I have found that the best technical basis for resuspension factors is
to simply use the most likely dust loading in air. That is, the dust
loading in air for extremely dusty conditions is about 1.0E-8 g/cc.
So, if the contamination can be expressed in terms of Ci/cc, it is
pretty simple to determine airborne concentrations under extrememly
dusty conditions. If the contamination is truly on the surface and
can be expressed only in terms of Ci/cm2, I have found that an
effective depth of 30 microns and the 1.0E-8 g/cc number can be used
to calculate airborne concentrations for extremely dusty conditions.
These calculated numbers seem to agree well with the resuspension of
fine, thinly spread powders in a glovebox.
If conditions are not extremely dusty, then the 1.0E-8 g/cc number can
be lowered accordingly, in any magic way you want or by actual dust
loading measurements. I have found that resuspension under damp
conditions (extremely low dust loading in air) seems to lower this
number by at least three orders of magnitude.
I don't know if this will help, but it summarizes my experience in
designing airborne controls for contaminated powders.