[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Radsafe purpose & intimidation

To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: Radsafe purpose & intimidation
From: xat@inel.gov (Alden Tschaeche)
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 1997 08:25:00 -0700
Organization: LMITCO
References: <199702070154.TAA25624@dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com>

Sandy Perle wrote:

> Radsafe is a public forum. If we can't exchange ideas, opinions,
> philosophies .. then Radsafe is a failure.

Agreed.  I would add "about matters related to radiation protection"
after "philosophies."  I find radsafe extremely useful and sort of feel
like part of a family and priveleged to participate in the discussion
when I am "talking" with others on the net.  Also, ad hominem attacks
are best reserved for off-radsafe messages.  Al Tschaeche xat@inel.gov

References:
- Radsafe purpose & intimidation
  - From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: radiopharmaceutical patient release
Next by Date: Re: Radiopharmaceutical patient release
Prev by thread: Re: Radsafe purpose & intimidation
Next by thread: Re: Radsafe purpose & intimidation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread