[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re(2): 10 CFR comparisons
- To: radsafe <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re(2): 10 CFR comparisons
- From: Raymond Carroll 441-6944 <CARROLLRG@lmus.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 16:54:44 -0500 (CDT)
- A1-type: MAIL
- Alternate-recipient: prohibited
- Hop-count: 1
- Importance: normal
- In-reply-to: <B7FF02BCB62ED111904900805F1961BEAFEACF@OKRS0032>
- MR-Received: by mta PADVX2; Relayed; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 17:55:54 -0500
- Posting-date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 16:55:00 -0500 (CDT)
- Priority: normal
- UA-content-id: D2606ZXNMO6ELL
- X400-MTS-identifier: [;45557142808991/1832507@PADVX2]
Yes, DOE did one when they were preparing 10 CFR 835. If you can't find a
copy let me know. I should have one around here somewhere. It will be
several years old but should be close.
Ray Carroll
carrollrg@lmus.com
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html