[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 10 CFR comparisons
- To: radsafe <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: 10 CFR comparisons
- From: Raymond Carroll 441-6944 <CARROLLRG@lmus.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 16:56:26 -0500 (CDT)
- A1-type: MAIL
- Alternate-recipient: prohibited
- Hop-count: 1
- Importance: normal
- In-reply-to: <3.0.1.32.19980824155249.00aa6fd8@popmail.jlab.org>
- MR-Received: by mta PADVX2; Relayed; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 17:57:34 -0500
- Posting-date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 16:57:00 -0500 (CDT)
- Priority: normal
- UA-content-id: D2612ZXNMO84C4
- X400-MTS-identifier: [;43757142808991/1832509@PADVX2]
Oops! Responded to a response instead of the message again. Yes DOE did do
one a few years ago when perparing 10 CFR 835. If you can't find a copy let
me know and I'll see if I can dig one up.
Ray Carroll
carrollrg@lmus.com
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html