[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Poll for you to vote to save Brookhaven Lab -Reply
That's fine, as long as the members of the press also recognize the utterly
unscientific surveys used by the "anti-nukes" to support their positions.
Claude Flory
Northeast Utilities
floryca@gwsmtp.nu.com
>>> Michael Mokrzycki <Michael_Mokrzycki@ap.org> 09/10/98 10:40am >>>
One of my responsibilities at AP involves supervising our coverage of
polls, and I feel compelled to point out the obvious: In no way can the
results of this utterly unscientific survey be construed as representing
the views of the general public or of any group other than those who know
about this Web site, go to it and choose to vote.
However, the current results might say something about the ability of
"pro-nukes" to mobilize online ...
My opinion only.
Mike Mokrzycki
Associated Press
New York
Kevin Donohoe <kjd@nucmed.bidmc.harvard.edu> on 09/10/98 10:23:01 AM
Please respond to radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
To: Multiple recipients of list
<radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
cc: (bcc: Michael Mokrzycki/TheAP)
Subject: Re: Poll for you to vote to save Brookhaven Lab
I just voted at this site. Despite it being an anti-nukes site, the
vote is (so far) 68% against closing the high flux beam reactor, 31% in
favor.
It seems our votes are having an impact.
Kevin Donohoe, M.D.
kjd@nucmed.bidmc.harvard.edu
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html