[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Poll for you to vote to save Brookhaven Lab



     Most media coverage of nuclear power is created from an easy to use 
     template that includes the 40 year old phrase "too cheap to meter", and 
     utterly unscientific information regarding the subjects of plutonium, 
     radioactive waste and low level radiation. I therefore find the below 
     criticism from AP ironic.
     
     John Hughes
     hughesj@songs.sce.com 
     
     
     
     Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:31:46 -0400
     From: Michael Mokrzycki <Michael_Mokrzycki@ap.org>
     To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
     Subject: Re: Poll for you to vote to save Brookhaven Lab
     Message-ID: <8525667B.004EE0BD.00@nyc2.ap.org>
     
     One of my responsibilities at AP involves supervising our coverage of
     polls, and I feel compelled to point out the obvious: In no way can the
     results of this utterly unscientific survey be construed as representing
     the views of the general public or of any group other than those who know
     about this Web site, go to it and choose to vote.
     
     However, the current results might say something about the ability of
     "pro-nukes" to mobilize online ...
     
     My opinion only.
     
     Mike Mokrzycki
     Associated Press
     New York
     

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html