[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Poll for you to vote to save Brookhaven Lab
Most media coverage of nuclear power is created from an easy to use
template that includes the 40 year old phrase "too cheap to meter", and
utterly unscientific information regarding the subjects of plutonium,
radioactive waste and low level radiation. I therefore find the below
criticism from AP ironic.
John Hughes
hughesj@songs.sce.com
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:31:46 -0400
From: Michael Mokrzycki <Michael_Mokrzycki@ap.org>
To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: Poll for you to vote to save Brookhaven Lab
Message-ID: <8525667B.004EE0BD.00@nyc2.ap.org>
One of my responsibilities at AP involves supervising our coverage of
polls, and I feel compelled to point out the obvious: In no way can the
results of this utterly unscientific survey be construed as representing
the views of the general public or of any group other than those who know
about this Web site, go to it and choose to vote.
However, the current results might say something about the ability of
"pro-nukes" to mobilize online ...
My opinion only.
Mike Mokrzycki
Associated Press
New York
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html