As for professional-ISM, of course, that depends entirely on the person.
Also, it was mentioned that education was important to the HP technician. I would tend to agree, but with a qualifier: The HP tech benefits more from what I would call "training" which seems to me to be "education related to practical matters" - much of which is gleaned from experience, than classical, university-type education. The sentiment that a "Health Physicist in a rad area" is dangerous, does have a ring of reality to it. The HP is not necessarily 'trained' to handle the responsibilities and duties of the HP technician's job. Therefore, he/she isn't neccesarily any more useful in that scenario than a brick layer (a noble profession, in its own right). Although the HP, if formally educated, could learn to be an HP tech much quicker. I believe that it is erroneous to assume that an HP (without training) is automatically qualified to perform as an HP tech.
As usual, these comments are worth what you paid for them.
--
Keith Welch
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Newport News VA
welch@jlab.org
Ph: (757)269-7212
FAX:(757)269-5048
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html