RE: terminology -Reply

["Robert Jolley" <rjolley@mail.state.tn.us>]

There is a  lot of "value added" in discussions of "methodologies" used by various government entities to "reinvent"  terminology , particularly in regard to "mortgage reduction", "legacy issues", and "visions" of future success.  Grandiose verbage does not necessarily equate to grandiose action.

Just my opinion.

Robert Jolley
rjolley@mail.state.tn.us

>>> "Richards, David" <david.richards@rfets.gov> 05/06/99 01:46pm >>>
One of my favorites is "laboratory scale quantities" when used as
justification for screening chemicals from the requirements for quantitative
hazards assessments. It covers a lot of ground and saves a lot of work. It
also saves people from having to be able to understand the results and
meaning of a semi-technical analysis.

DJ Richards
Rocky Flats

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Les Slaback [SMTP:lester.slaback%nist.gov@inet.rfets.gov]
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 11:03 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: terminology
> 
> DoE has originated some terms that could be profitably used in the NRC
> world.
> 
> 
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
                                            
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html