Re: Nuclear Laundry -Reply

[Jim Muckerheide <jmuckerheide@delphi.com>]

Seems simple:  It's as close to zero as need be relative to natural sources
of radioactivity to make this another wasteful exercise in fostering public
fear.

Regards, Jim Muckerheide
muckerheide@mediaone.net
===================

Michael S Ford wrote:

> I think Jack's point was --- and as you pointed out --- if you don't
> know the pathway, you don't have a full dose conversion picture --
> provided there is any uptake pathway at all (as you also pointed
> out).  So, in this case, concentration to dose would not be simple,
> right?
>
> Where's my coffee?
> v/r
> Michael
> mford@pantex.com
>
> >>> High Plains Drifter wrote on Wed 28 Jul 99  1:23 >>>
>
> ... Jack, concentrations to dose factors is simple.  The real
> problem is the uptake pathway.  To my knowledge there is no
> sewer to human pathway that would be considered a critical
> internal exposure pathway....
>
> High Plains Drifter.....
> magna1@jps.net
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html