[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Misuse of Rad Symbol
Perhaps I'm an island on this one, but I fail to see the big deal with such
a marketing ploy. WHAT IS THE CONCERN? I would understand if trefoils and
biohazard symbols were being incorrectly posted at a nuclear facility,
construction site, neighborhood, etc. where obvious confusion could arise
from their presence...but in a magazine? Are you suggesting censorship on
marketing techniques from a magazine publisher whom offers you a FREE
SUBSCRIPTION?
Mr. Rima, I would politely suggest you make better use of our tax dollars as
well as the RADSAFE forum by putting your obvious expertise to use for a
purposeful cause.
Actually, I'm quite dumbfounded by your posting.
Eric Laning, RSO
FUSRAP Maywood Superfund Site
mailto:ejlaning@bechtel.com
-----Original Message-----
From: steve.rima@DOEGJPO.COM [mailto:steve.rima@DOEGJPO.COM]
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 1999 12:05 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Misuse of Rad Symbol
RADSAFERS,
I subscribe to one of those free publications, in this case called
"Industrial Safety and Hygiene News", that permeate our industry. I
received the September issue yesterday, and it had the standard rad
symbol (very large version) on the front of the cover with the words
"THE END IS NEAR" printed over it! Obviously curious, I found that the
message referred to my free subscription coming due for renewal. The
symbol is on the cover in five different places, both front and back.
The "end is near" message is on both the front and back as well.
I wrote to the editor to express my dismay over this intentional
misuse of a safety-related symbol. I just received the following
(somewhat arrogant) reply stating that he considers this to be a valid
use of the symbol in their "marketing effort": (perhaps the HPS should
use the international Biohazard symbol in a similar "marketing
effort"? ;-) )
>Mr. Rima,
>Thanks for your feedback. Trade magazines across the board are
>finding it increasingly difficult in this hectic age to get readers
>to "requalify" their free subscriptions, thus resorting to various
>devices to grab attention and requalifications. Some call them
>creative; you're the first to express to me anger. I respect your
>opinion, though I do not agree that we're "stupid" at this end.
>Unless I receive more feedback from readers regarding the use of
>safety symbols, I'll hold to my own opinion that most readers
>appreciate a free subscription every month and accept our efforts to
>sustain those subscriptions for what they are-marketing efforts.
>Dave Johnson
If any RADSAFERS care to let Mr. Johnson know their opinion of this
use of the symbol, his email address is: djsafe@bellatlantic.net
Steven D. Rima, CHP, CSP
Manager, Health Physics and Industrial Hygiene
MACTEC-ERS, LLC
steve.rima@doegjpo.com
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html