Re: Missing Shipment?

[William V Lipton <liptonw@dteenergy.com>]

Don't  hold back, tell us how you really feel!

Either the package was delivered on October 26, or it was delivered on November
2; but not both.  It would seem to be in everyone's best interest to resolve
this before publishing the report.

The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
It's not about dose, it's about trust.

Bill Lipton
liptonw@dteenergy.com

dkosloff1 wrote:

> It would be illegal, unethical and wrong in every possible way for the NRC
> to edit or selectively print verbal reports and written notifications that
> it receives from licensees.
>
> Telling the truth promptly as it is known at the time is the only acceptable
> behavior.
>
> How would you propose that the NRC should go about hiding information from
> the public?
>
> Don Kosloff, dkosloff1@msn.com
> 2910 Main St. PERRY OH 44081.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William V Lipton" <liptonw@dteenergy.com>
> To: "Multiple recipients of list" <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 11:54 AM
> Subject: Re: Missing Shipment?
>
> > Although it is true that the NRC prints the licensee notifications
> virtually
> > unedited, the agency loses credibility when it prints reports which are so
> > obviously self-contradictory.
>
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html