[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: So, is reprocessing in America's future?
> [radiation]can kill
you from inside of a non-energized, hermetically sealed jar.
How is that different from, say, a charcoal fire over which a vendor roasts
chestnuts? The fire is dangerous, so you keep it in a container and shield
bystanders from (most of) the heat.
I don't think anyone worries about the direct radiation from unshielded
radwaste. It's easy to provide reliable shielding. The only argument I've
heard concerns the possibility of particles leaking out and becoming
ingested. And that problem, it seems to me, is identical to that posed by
any chemical toxicant. Except that the radioactive material slowly but
inevitably decreases its toxicity all by itself, whereas most chemicals
don't.
Ted Rockwell
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.