[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Gov't to Reverse on Illness Claims
Index:
US Gov't to Reverse on Illness Claims
US Customs Wants Containers Detailed
================================
US Gov't to Reverse on Illness Claims
WASHINGTON Aug 7 (AP) - Under pressure from Congress, the Bush
administration has decided to reverse policy and quit fighting
illness compensation claims from Cold War-era nuclear weapons workers
exposed to toxic chemicals.
Final Energy Department regulations, obtained by The Associated Press
and expected to be issued Thursday, instruct contractors not to
contest medical panels' findings that workers' illnesses are related
to job exposure.
The new rules reverse a decades-old policy and differ from a draft
proposal circulated earlier this year that allowed contractors to
contest such findings and even said the Energy Department would help
pay for appeals.
The regulations could affect more than 12,000 workers currently
seeking help from the Energy Department in getting compensation. Most
of the affected workers live in states with large DOE facilities,
such as Colorado, Kentucky, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, South Carolina,
Tennessee, Texas and Washington.
Lawmakers from states with nuclear weapons plants said the
administration's original proposal ran counter to the intent of a
bill Congress passed two years ago.
``It appears that DOE has addressed the major concerns that were
raised about the draft rule last spring,'' said Sen. Fred Thompson, R-
Tenn., who added that more workers would now get compensated.
Richard Miller, a policy analyst with the Government Accountability
Project, a Washington watchdog group, said Energy Secretary Spencer
Abraham ``overrode his own staff and really deserves some credit for
reversing some of the flaws in the previous rule.''
The rule is aimed at helping thousands of workers across the country
who were exposed to toxic substances at Energy Department facilities
run by government contractors.
Those workers were not included in a year-old federal program that
provides medical care and $150,000 each to weapons plant workers made
ill by exposure to radiation or silica and beryllium, which cause
lung diseases.
Instead, Congress told the Energy Department to help the chemical-
exposed workers file claims under state worker compensation systems.
``This rule is directed at ensuring that DOE assists as many of those
contractor employees, who may have been exposed to toxic substances
while working at DOE facilities, as possible in obtaining the state
workers' compensation benefits they deserve,'' Abraham said.
Under the new rule, the Energy Department will establish a uniform
standard for physicians to consider when determining what made a
worker sick.
``A single causation standard rather than 50 different state
standards is a major help,'' said Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio.
Lawmakers also praised the uniform standard for being generous rather
than restrictive. It says a claimant should be reimbursed if exposure
to a toxic substance on the job was ``a significant factor in
aggravating, contributing to or causing the worker's illness or
death.''
The new regulations also provide that only a majority vote is needed
to find in favor of a claimant, compared with a unanimous vote needed
under the old policy.
The potential cost of the claims is in the hundreds of millions of
dollars. Many weapons plant contractors are self-insured and are
reimbursed by the Energy Department for worker compensation costs.
But a problem still exists in cases where contractors have private
insurance policies. The Energy Department has no contractual
relationship with the private insurers and cannot instruct them to
pay claims.
Similarly, if contractors are covered by a state insurance fund, the
Energy Department has no authority to instruct the state fund to pay
a sick worker claim.
Miller said his group now wants Congress to pass new legislation to
make the federal government pay those claims as well.
On the Net:
Energy Department: http://www.energy.gov/
--------------------
US Customs Wants Containers Detailed
WASHINGTON Aug 7 (AP) - The U.S. Customs Service, seeking to prevent
terrorists from bringing nuclear and other deadly weapons into the
United States, wants details on the contents of sea containers
destined for this country 24 hours before the cargo is loaded onto
ships at foreign ports.
The proposed regulation, unveiled Wednesday, marks the agency's
latest effort to improve the security of cargo entering the United
States from the world's seaports.
Currently, many U.S. and foreign sea carriers voluntarily provide
customs with advance cargo information, but customs may not get the
information until a few days before a ship carrying the cargo reaches
a U.S. port, said Customs Commissioner Robert Bonner.
In order to effectively evaluate and identify cargo that may pose a
risk to U.S. security, customs must have timely and accurate manifest
information, Bonner said in an interview.
That information also is crucial to another cargo security effort
spearheaded by Bonner - the customs container security initiative -
which plays a key role in President Bush's homeland security
strategy. Under that initiative, U.S. customs officers would screen
high-risk U.S. bound cargo containers before they leave foreign
seaports.
So far this year, agreements have been reached with Canada,
Singapore, the Netherlands, Belgium, France and Germany to station
U.S. customs inspectors at specific ports in those countries for the
first time. U.S. inspectors are already in Canada, but they will
soon be stationed in select ports of the other participating
countries, Bonner said.
With 5.7 million cargo containers entering U.S. seaports each year,
Bonner says it is critically important to prevent terrorists from
using sea containers to smuggle nuclear, chemical, biological or
other deadly weapons into this country. Approximately 90 percent
of the world's cargo moves by sea containers.
The issue of improving the security of sea cargo took on heightened
importance in the United States after the Sept. 11 attacks.
``It is a matter of urgency that customs knows in advance what is in
the containers destined for the United States,'' Bonner said.
The proposal doesn't specify how companies would provide the advance
manifest information to customs, but most of those that
voluntarily provide the information do so electronically, customs
officials said.
A final regulation could be adopted as early as this fall.
A provision contained in a sweeping trade bill signed into law by
Bush on Tuesday would eventually require advance information on
all cargo - not just sea containers - be to electronically provided
to customs, Bonner said. He said that provision would be
implemented on a separate track.
Under the proposal, companies that don't provide accurate manifest
information 24 hours in advance could be subject to fines. But
Bonner pointed out that customs has the authority to prevent a
company from unloading a cargo container, a possible option at its
disposal to penalize violators.
Some of the information that would have to be provided in advance
under the proposal includes a precise description of the containers'
contents, date of scheduled arrival in the United States, the foreign
port of departure, shippers' name and address and vessel name and
number. Generic descriptions, such as freight of all kinds or general
cargo, won't be accepted.
On the Net:
Customs Service: http://www.customs.gov
***************************************************************
Sandy Perle Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100
Director, Technical Extension 2306
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service Fax:(714) 668-3149
ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/