[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-131 THERAPY DOSES AT NUC MED FACILITIES
>
>Dear Reader:
>
>I understand that a fraction of iodine-131 therapy doses volatilizes and
>escapes the open vial.
Please see the journal Health Physics, Vol. 36 (January 1979), pp. 68-69.
It's a research note from some Ohio State people - Richard D. Myser and
Robert W. Pollack - touching on this very subject. I quote: "... upon
opening a container of NaI solution, a cloud of radioiodine is released, and
then a steady-state vaporization rate is quickly reached. With a 30-mCi NaI
solution, this steady-state rate was 0.005 microCi/min." Techniques for
keeping air concentration down during transport and administration are also
discussed.
>I am wondering what methods do other Nuclear
>Medicine facilities use to account for this fraction and show effluent
>concentration is within DAC. We in-line sample the exhausted air using
>charcoal filter. A 12,000 CFM
>outside air is introduced to the air exhaust from our Nuclear Medicine hood.
That's a lot of air! If you can show the volatilization does not exceed
14.6 microCi/minute, then you've shown the emission concentration is below
DAC. Too bad the EPA doesn't use DAC as a criterion . . .
>If you sample the air using activated charcoal, have you
>detected any I-131? I thank you for your forthcoming response.
We've taken samples from the exhaust from one of the Nuclear Pharmacy hoods,
because they iodinate a lot with I-125. Usually monoclonal antibodies for
use in radioisotope-guided surgery (RIGS). In a few samples, I've noticed
an I-131 peak, but I-125 always predominates.
NP added a charcoal filter to the hood last year (not in-line, but right at
the air inlet, on the ceiling of the hood chamber). It hasn't seemed to
reduce the emission rate much. How effective is yours?
Albert Lee Vest avest@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
health physicist Office of Radiation Safety
(614)292-0122 The Ohio State University
My employer did not review or approve this message.