[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Dosimeter Location
- To: "radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu" <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: RE: Dosimeter Location
- From: "Tupin, Edward A. 301-827-1230 Fax 594-4760" <EAT@FDADR.CDRH.FDA.GOV>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 17:07:02 EST
- A1-Type: MAIL
- Alternate-Recipient: prohibited
- Hop-Count: 0
- Importance: normal
- In-Reply-To: <199509262130.OAA12585@PEAK.ORG>
- Mr-Received: by mta CVAX3; Relayed; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 17:36:22 -0500 (EST)
- Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 17:36:00 EST
- Priority: normal
- Ua-Content-Id: D247ZVYRP5R99
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [;22637182905991/519083@FDADR]
The issue of personnel dosimetry in diagnostic radiology, particulary
interventional fluoroscopy procedures which may involve extremely long
"x-ray on" times (hours!) was addressed as part of the 1992 National
Council on Radiation Protection and Measuremnt (NCRP) annual meeting.
See the proceedings (available from NCRP) for complete text. The
presentations addressed the issue of dosimeter placement when personal
protection (lead aprons) were worn and the relationship of dosimeter
readings to effective dose equivalent.
There is no current written specific guidance available. This is where
the HP earns his money - use your best judgement to put the dosimeters
where they will allow you to demonstrate compliance with the relevant
limits. It make some work to figure out where the most limiting doses
are occurring. Once you decide where the badges should go, and why,
write it down.
In the much of the non-DOE U.S. federal world, the OSHA guidance for
occupational exposure to ionizing radiation (29CFR1910.96) still
applies. (Same as "old" 10CFR20). Some states have adopted the current
NRC guidance and made it applicable to all modes of radiation exposure.
Ed Tupin
RSO, Center for Devices and Radiological Health
EAT@fdadr.cdrh.fda.gov
(301) 827-1230
Fax: (301) 594-4760