[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Radon and lung cancer

To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: Radon and lung cancer
From: Bernard L Cohen <blc+@pitt.edu>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 12:32:08 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19980302115632.00688364@america.net>

	All I ask is that someone offer a not implausible possible
explanation for my data that is consistent with LNT. Is that asking too
much? I have offered a sizable monetary reward, and this would settle an
issue that is bothering a lot of scientists. I am quite sure it would be
publishable. It seems to me that, in the absence of such an explanation,
it is reasonable to conclude that the linear-no threshold theory fails in
the low dose region.

Bernard L. Cohen
Physics Dept.
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
Tel: (412)624-9245
Fax: (412)624-9163
e-mail: blc+@pitt.edu

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Radon and lung cancer
  - From: "R. William Field" <bill-field@uiowa.edu>

References:
- Re: Radon and lung cancer
  - From: Bob Hearn <rah@america.net>

Prev by Date: Ion Chambers & Stack Monitoring
Next by Date: Jay Gould book
Prev by thread: Re: Radon and lung cancer
Next by thread: Re: Radon and lung cancer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread