[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
10 CFR 71 Question
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (IPM Return requested) (Receipt notification requested)
- Subject: 10 CFR 71 Question
- From: Ruth Weiner <rfweine@sandia.gov>
- Date: 01 Sep 1998 16:49:51 -0600
- Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- Priority: normal
- Return-Receipt-To: Ruth Weiner <rfweine@sandia.gov>
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-MTS-Identifier: [/c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; 00CBE35EC7A0F074-mtaSNL]
- X400-Originator: rfweine@sandia.gov
- X400-Received: by mta mtaSNL in /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 01 Sep 1998 16:49:51 -0600
- X400-Received: by /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 01 Sep 1998 16:49:51 -0600
- X400-Recipients: non-disclosure;
Dear RADSAFERs,
Does anyone out there in RADSAFE land have an idea of the philosophy
underlying the exclusion of various radionuclides from tables of A1
and A2 values of 10 CFR Part 71? In some cases the A1/A2 value for a
parent radionuclide is appropriate, but not for all exclusions. We at
Sandia Transportation Technology Department would appreciate any
thoughts you might have.
Ruth Weiner
rfweine@sandia.gov
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html